Fossil or GitHub only?

hnb · 2016-08-29 08:27:06

Hi!

Fossil makes me crazy. Can I use github only for contribution purposes (via pull request)? Should I update manually SynopseCommit.inc?

ab · 2016-08-29 10:30:59

Yes, GitHub is fine, if you prefer to.
I will update the commit.inc file on my side.

hnb · 2016-08-29 11:24:05

Thanks for info. New pull request ready : ), much better way for me.

mpv · 2016-08-29 14:51:53

Hmm... AB - it will broke the current SourceCodeRep.exe flow. Or you apply a pull request to fossil first?

ab · 2016-08-29 14:56:56

I did a manual merge.

mpv · 2016-08-29 15:32:15

When the number of contributors will increase manual merge will do more and more difficult. Perhaps we should go back to the idea of a single repository (git). In fact we can even host a mORMot site on github using github pages.
P.S.
I love fossil, but it is not widely used

ab · 2016-08-29 15:35:19

Small contributions need manual merge, since they are very likely to be not correct, from my experiment.

mORMot Open Source

#1 2016-08-29 08:27:06

Fossil or GitHub only?

#2 2016-08-29 10:30:59

Re: Fossil or GitHub only?

#3 2016-08-29 11:24:05

Re: Fossil or GitHub only?

#4 2016-08-29 14:51:53

Re: Fossil or GitHub only?

#5 2016-08-29 14:56:56

Re: Fossil or GitHub only?

#6 2016-08-29 15:32:15

Re: Fossil or GitHub only?

#7 2016-08-29 15:35:19

Re: Fossil or GitHub only?

Board footer